Welcome to our Oregon City Bankruptcy Mini-Site!

Featured

Welcome to our mini-website for Oregon City bankruptcy. The attorneys of Baxter & Baxter, LLP, are dedicated advocates for consumers. Baxter & Baxter, LLP, is a Pacific Northwest consumer protection law firm with offices in Oregon and Washington. To visit our firm’s main website, visit www.baxterlaw.com.

The Oregon consumer protection lawyers of the Consumer Litigation Group represent individuals in cases with false credit reports, identity theft cases, unlawful debt collection cases, and consumer fraud cases. The Portland Oregon bankruptcy attorneys, Oregon City, Oregon bankruptcy attorneys, Hillsboro, Oregon bankruptcy attorneys, and Vancouver Washington bankruptcy lawyers of the Bankruptcy Practice Group represent individuals in Chapter 7 and Chapter 13 bankruptcy. Our mission of committed and zealous consumer advocacy is unrivaled, and our track record of excellence and professionalism is recognized nationwide.

For more information about the consumer litigation group, click on the links below:

For more information about the bankruptcy practice group, click on the links below:

“We are a debt relief agency. We help people file for relief under the Bankruptcy Code.”

Benjamin Kim

Featured

Ben Kim
Law Office of Benjamin Kim

Today, I am writing about Oregon City criminal defense attorney, Ben Kim. I recently had the excellent opportunity to serve on a jury in a DUII case in Clackamas County. Ben represented the defendant in a two day jury trial. Jury service was an illuminating experience for me, but getting to watch a skilled and experienced lawyer engaged in his craft was particularly educational for me. Ben’s best attributes in the trial were that he was imminently at ease with the jury, and built a nice rapport with the jurors. He also broke through lawyer stereotypes of untempered braggadocio, and instead came across as sincere and genuine.

Ben is a former prosecutor who now has a private criminal defense firm in Oregon City. From his website, he “joined the Los Angeles District Attorney’s Office as a Deputy District Attorney and worked as Prosecutor for over ten years handling a wide array of crimes, from Driving While Intoxicated to Murder. Eventually, Mr. Kim was selected to become a member of the Hardcore Gang Unit, a small group of Prosecutors who exclusively handled gang related homicide cases.”

Ben exclusively handles criminal defense cases involving DUII, Domestic Violence, Assault, Robbery, Burglary, Theft, Murder, and Aggravated Murder. I talked to Ben after the trial and told him that if I was ever pulled over in Clackamas County, I would know who to call!

You can contact Ben at:

Benjamin Kim
Attorney at Law
294 Warner Milne Rd
Oregon City, OR 97045
(503) 344-6251
www.benkimlaw.com

Best regards,
Justin Baxter
Baxter & Baxter, LLP

Remedies For Attempt to Collect Debts Included in Bankruptcy

Featured

One of the most important benefits of filing for bankruptcy is that it will stop collection calls, letters, and other activities by debt collectors. This includes garnishments, lawsuits, and repossessions. When creditors or collectors do not cease collection efforts, consumers may be able to seek additional recourse in court. This article discusses some of the key protections for debtors who are being harassed over bills included in bankruptcy.

Violation of the Automatic Stay

When any person, business, or other entity files the initial petition for bankruptcy, the bankruptcy court judge enters an automatic stay. This is essentially a “safe harbor” for the debtor to catch their breath and prepare for the rest of the bankruptcy case. During the automatic stay, all collection efforts of any kind are prohibited.

The bankruptcy code provides a private cause of action for an individual injured by any willful violation of the automatic stay. The injured individual is entitled to recover “actual damages,” including court costs and attorney’s fees. An award of actual damages requires a showing of injury or loss stemming from acts in violation of the stay. Some examples of acts that have repeatedly supported an award for actual damages are repossession of a debtor’s vehicle, locking a debtor out of a rented property, filing a lawsuit against a debtor, and continued efforts at the collection of debts owed before filing bankruptcy. Punitive damages are awarded when the creditor’s collection activities are particularly egregious.

Violation of the Discharge Injunction

The final discharge order entered by the bankruptcy court judge is an injunction that releases the debtor from personal liability for specified debts. The discharge is a permanent injunction or order prohibiting the debtor’s creditors from taking any form of collection action on discharged debts, including filing lawsuits, garnishing bank accounts or wages, and other collection efforts with the debtor, such as telephone calls, letters, and personal contacts.

A debtor that is harassed over discharged debts after the entry of the final discharge order can bring a contempt proceeding against the violating creditor. This is an adversary proceeding in the bankruptcy court, either brought as a motion for a contempt order, or an adversary action. The bankruptcy court judge can award an injured individual “actual damages,” including court costs and attorney’s fees. In appropriate cases, the creditor may be required to pay penalties or sanctions.

Fair Debt Collection Practices Act

In most courts, it is possible for a consumer to assert a Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) case, when a creditor attempts to collect a debt that is discharged in bankruptcy. There are many articles about the provisions of the FDCPA, but in general, that federal law prohibits certain collection practices relating to bills that the debtor does not owe. Under the FDCPA, consumers can seek compensatory damages, statutory damages, and attorney fees.

The exception to this is Walls v. Wells Fargo, a federal appellate court opinion from the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, which applies as binding precedent in California, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Oregon, Washington, Alaska, Hawaii and Guam. That case held that the FDCPA was preempted by the bankruptcy code, and that debtors are limited to seeking remedies for violations of the discharge injunction, as discussed above.

Justin M. Baxter
Baxter & Baxter, LLP
Portland, Oregon
(503) 297-9031

http://www.baxterlaw.com

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Justin_Baxter

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/2587134

Baxter & Baxter, LLP | Social Media Websites